Should we agree to disagree about Twitter’s bot problem?

نویسندگان

چکیده

Bots, simply defined as accounts controlled by automation, can be used a weapon for online manipulation and pose threat to the health of platforms. Researchers have studied platforms detect, estimate, characterize bot accounts. Concerns about prevalence bots were raised following Elon Musk’s bid acquire Twitter. In this work, we want stress that crucial questions need answered in order make proper estimation compare different methodologies definitions based on behaviors activities; otherwise real concerning will confounded disagreements models. We argue how assumptions bot-likely behavior, detection approach, population inspected affect percentage Finally, emphasize responsibility vigilant, transparent, unbiased dealing with threats may their users.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End‐of‐Life Decisions

End-of-life decision-making is controversial. There are different views about when it is appropriate to limit life-sustaining treatment, and about what palliative options are permissible. One approach to decisions of this nature sees consensus as crucial. Decisions to limit treatment are made only if all or a majority of caregivers agree. We argue, however, that it is a mistake to require profe...

متن کامل

Phage taxonomy: we agree to disagree.

Bacteriophage (phage) researchers are in universal agreement that phage biology has undergone a renaissance in recent years. No longer just tools of molecular biology, phage are now recognized to play critical roles in bacterial pathogenesis (3, 29) and bacterial population dynamics (5, 10). Likewise, phage therapy is enjoying renewed interest in Western medicine (24). Phage-derived proteins ar...

متن کامل

A Dialogue Game to Agree to Disagree about Inconsistent Information

This paper proposes a dialogue game in which coherent conversational sequences at the speech act level are described of agents that become aware they have a disagreement and settle the dispute by agreeing to disagree when they believe insufficient propositions to resolve the situation. A dialogue game is formulated in which agents can offer information possibly resulting in non-reconcilable, mu...

متن کامل

Disagreeing About What We Disagree About

Two studies examined misperceptions of disagreement in partisan social conflicts, namely, in the debates over abortion (Study 1) and politics (Study 2). We observed that partisans tend to exaggerate differences of opinion with their adversaries. Further, we found that perceptions of disagreement were more pronounced for values that were central to the perceiver’s own ideology than for values th...

متن کامل

P-138: What Should We Know about Ethical Problem in ART? A Study of Systematic Review

Background: Advances in medical technology have had major impacts on human reproduction. The development of effective contraceptive methods has reduced unwanted fertility, and the development of a variety of drugs and procedures has, for the first time, permitted women with fertility problems to reasonably expect that they can fulfill their desires to have children. So, The aim of this review a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Online Social Networks and Media

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2468-6964']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100263